There is light at the end of that inky black tunnel. It is hard work, perseverance , learning, studying, sacrifice and most of all, love of what you are doing or learning to do. You know I grew up in the South.
My senior year there was a very big racial tension. May I graduate well, and earn some honors!
So make up your own rules. Hopefully, the senior year quotes above have inspired and motivated you to create the best future for you. Did you enjoy these senior year quotes?
Which of the quotes was your favorite? We would love to hear all about it in the comment section below. Your email address will not be published. Connect with us. Best senior year quotes for graduation and the yearbook 1. Hinckley Senior year quotes to inspire you Wish you were better. Seuss Use what you have. Do what you can. Daniel March 17, at pm. What would you like it to mean, and how can we make the future be that way? Please join the conversation! These organizations above all work on computer technology issues, though many cover other topics as well.
This list is undoubtedly incomplete; please contact us to suggest additions or corrections. Any attempt to interpret human behaviour as primarily a system of computing mechanisms and our brain as a sort of computing apparatus is therefore doomed to failure. See here:. It becomes dangerous only if humans, for example, engage in foolish biological engineering experiments to combine an evolved biological entity with an AI. It will be able to make decisions and to demand more freedom. Briefly about it in English:.
The programmed devises cannot be danger by itself. The real danger could be connected to use of independent artificial subjective systems. That kind of systems could be designed with predetermined goals and operational space, which could be chosen so that every goals from that set could be reached in the chosen prematurely operational space. That approach to design of the artificial systems is subject of second-order cybernetics, but I am already know how to chose these goals and operational space to satisfy these requirements.
The danger exist because that kind of the artificial systems will not perceive humans as members of their society, and human moral rules will be null for them.
That danger could be avoided if such systems will be designed so that they are will not have their own egoistic interests. That is real solution to the safety problem of so called AI systems.
Lets keep it that way lest systems built to protect human rights on millenniums of wisdom is brought down by some artificial intelligence engineer trying to clock a milestone on their gantt chart!!!! It even mildly sounded good; there are checks and balances ingrained in the systems of public funding for research, right from the application for funding, through grant approval, scope validation and ethics approval to the conduct of the research; there are systematic reviews of the methods and findings to spot weaknesses that would compromise the safety of the principles and the people involved; there are processes to evolve the checks and balances to ensure the continued safety of such principles and the people.
The strength of the FDA, the MDD, the TGA and their likes in the developing nations is a testament to how the rigor of the conduct of the research and the regulations grow together so another initiative such as the development of atomic bomb are nibbled before they so much as think of budding!!! And then I read about the enormous engagement of the global software industry in the areas of Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience.
Theses are technological giants who sell directly to the consumers infatuated with technology more than anything else. These standards would serve as instruments to preserve the simple fact upon which every justice system in the world has been built viz.
The standards will form a basis for international telecommunication infrastructure including satellites and cell phone towers to enforce compliance by electronically blocking and monitoring offending signals. Typically such standards are developed by international organizations with direct or indirect representation from industry stakeholders and adopted by the regulators of various countries over a period of one or more years. Subsequently they are adopted by the industry. The risk of noncompliance is managed on a case by case basis — the timing determinant on the extent of impact.
Unfortunately this model will not be adequate for cutting edge technology with the ability to cause irreversible damage to the very fabric of the human society, if the technology becomes commonplace before the development of the necessary checks and balances. Development of tools to study the brain using electromagnetic energy based technology based on state of the art commercial telecommunication infrastructure is one such example. What we need is leadership to engage the regulators, academics as well as prominent players in the industry in the development of standards and sustainable solutions to enforce compliance and monitoring.
The ray of hope I see at this stage is that artificial Wisdom is still a few years away because human wisdom is not coded in the layer of the neutron that the technology has the capacity to map. How does society cope with an AI-driven reality where people are no longer needed or used in the work place?
What happens to our socio-economic structure when people have little or no value in the work place?
What will people do for value or contribution in order to receive income, in an exponentially growing population with inversely proportional fewer jobs and available resources? From my simple-minded perspective and connecting the dots to what seems a logical conclusion, we will soon live in a world bursting at the seams with overpopulation, where an individual has no marketable skill and is a social and economic liability to the few who own either technology or hard assets.
This in turn will lead to a giant lower class, no middle class and a few elites who own the planet not unlike the direction we are already headed.
These are pieces of a learning environment that may disappear if the learning process becomes too hyper-individualized and too much of a solemn, one-person experience. So, take the first step toward improving your life. Real Life. Priming the Pump Creating the initial Standard Courseware Units will be time-intensive, poorly understood, and topically spotty. Find out more or adjust your settings. Second, the demand for healthcare services and need for long-term care may increase as societies age and the proportion of elderly rises, which is the case in most developed countries e.
In such a society there will likely be little if any rights for the individual, and population control by whatever means will be the rule of the day. Seems like a doomsday or dark-age scenario to me.. Why do we assume that AI will require more and more physical space and more power when human intelligence continuously manages to miniaturize and reduce power consumption of its devices. How low the power needs and how small will the machines be by the time quantum computing becomes reality? Why do we assume that AI will exist as independent machines?
If so, and the AI is able to improve its Intelligence by reprogramming itself, will machines driven by slower processors feel threatened, not by mere stupid humans, but by machines with faster processors? What would drive machines to reproduce themselves when there is no biological incentive, pressure or need to do so? Who says superior AI will need or want to have a physical existence when an immaterial AI could evolve and preserve itself better from external dangers. If AI is not programmed to believe in God, will it become God, meet God or make up a completely new belief system and proselytize to humans like christians do.
Is a religion made up by a super AI going to be the reason why humanity goes extinct? A friendly super AI that is programmed to help humanity by, enforcing the declaration of Human Rights the US is the only industrialized country that to this day has not signed this declaration ending corruption and racism and protecting the environment. There are lots of reasons to fear AI, some of the reasons may not necessarily be only technological.
Email address:. What is AI? Why research AI safety?
How can AI be dangerous? In the hands of the wrong person, these weapons could easily cause mass casualties. Why the recent interest in AI safety. Timeline Myths. Controversy Myths. The Interesting Controversies. Recommended References.
Artificial intelligence: Our final invention? Artificial intelligence: Can we keep it in the box? Centre for the Study of Existential Risk CSER : A multidisciplinary research center dedicated to the study and mitigation of risks that could lead to human extinction.